Legal internship opportunities
The Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal and Western Cape Divisions of the High Court, in partnership with the Democratic Governance and Rights Unit (DGRU) in the Faculty of Law at the University of Cape Town (UCT), are running a nine-month (9) internship programme for graduates.
What the Mbenenge Tribunal decision really means
The Mbenenge Tribunal found Judge President Mbenenge not guilty of gross misconduct, but guilty of serious misconduct. This explainer unpacks what the ruling actually means, what still lies ahead at the JSC, and why the decision matters for judicial accountability.
2026: A decisive year for judicial accountability and institutional reform
As South Africa enters 2026, the judiciary faces a decisive test. Promises of reform must now translate into real accountability, institutional independence, and restored public trust.
2025 a critical year for judicial reform and accountability
The year 2025 has been a rollercoaster for South Africa’s judiciary, marked by deliberate governance reform alongside major blows to the public’s perception of the institution. While the country hosted prestigious events, implemented a new sexual harassment policy, and took steps toward full judicial independence, we also witnessed a decline in judicial appointments and several […]
![[MEDIA STATEMENT] Judges Matter calls for Gauteng High Court judge charged with corruption to step down and be suspended immediately](https://www.judgesmatter.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Judges-M-Media-Statement-scaled.jpg)
[MEDIA STATEMENT] Judges Matter calls for Gauteng High Court judge charged with corruption to step down and be suspended immediately
Judges Matter calls for the immediate suspension of a Gauteng High Court judge arrested on allegations of corruption and money laundering, urging the JSC to invoke its extraordinary powers to protect the integrity of the judiciary.
Fewer appointments, higher standards: What the October 2025 JSC session revealed
The JSC’s October 2025 interviews marked real progress in raising standards and enforcing ethics in judicial appointments, but gaps in voting procedures and accountability still undermine the process.
